The Tokyo premiere of Steven Spielberg’s film War of the Worlds has been cancelled due to security fears.

The BBC reports:

Film distributor UIP decided to shelve the gala screening on 13 June amid concerns about protecting the picture’s stars, including Tom Cruise.

There were also worries about pirate copies of the film being made from illegal recordings at the event.

Some 7,000 Japanese fans who won seats at the premiere are likely to be offered alternative prizes.

I have trouble imaging how security could be such a problem in Japan that they cann’t guarantee Tom Cruise’s safety. Who would want to hurt him? Unless there is of course some kind of secret war brewing between the Scientologists and Japan’s Alpeh cult (formerly known as Aum Shinrikyo).

What does this say about us and our readers?

I just noticed that in the “recent comment” section our two most popular posts, with 12 comments each, deal with Sino-Japanese pedophilia and mechanical pencils. I also noticed that neither was authored by me.

Hmm…

Perhpas my next post should be on the economics of mechanical pencil weilding East Asian sexual deviants.

More beef with the Japanese government

Well, it wasn’t hard to see this one coming. Although I must admit, I thought it wouldn’t happen until shortly after the ban on U.S. beef imports was lifted.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation today ran this story on fears that Japan would raise the tariff on frozen beef imports 11.5 % to 50%, up from the current 38.5 %.

If any of this sounds vaguely familiar, that’s because it’s all been done before.

Following Japan’s first mad cow hysteria a few years back, Japanese beef consumption fell, for domestic beef at least. To compensate for the fall in supply, more beef had to be imported. (Those of you in Japan at the time might remember Yoshinoya’s now sadly ironic 100% American Beef campaign.) The resulting increase in imports triggered the tariff, which took effect on August 1, 2003 and lasted until the following April.

Now there is talk of that same tariff taking effect this August as well.

How can Japan get away with this you ask?

Well, it’s easy. Under the Uruguay Round, Japan agreed to lower tariffs on imported beef from 50% to the current 38.5%. However, it retained the legal right to reinstitute the 50% tariff in the event that imports increased 17% or more on a quarterly basis.

The reasoning behind allowing such recourse was to safeguard domestic producers against sudden surges in imports, which is very much the idea behind other types of safeguards also allowed under WTO regulations.

According to the WTO:

safeguard measures are defined as “emergency” actions with respect to increased imports of particular products, where such imports have caused or threaten to cause serious injury to the importing Member’s domestic industry.

The catch is that these temporary measures were meant to protect against unfair trade practices. They were never intended to be used as an unfair trade practice.

Theoretically, safeguards give domestic producers of cattle or any other traded good time to restructure the industry or take some other sort of defensive measures to increase competitiveness. But the fact is that the competitiveness of Japanese cattle farmers is not the issue here.

The issue here is that domestic beef consumption is rising to once normal levels, and that has automatically triggered the tariff. Ironically, as pointed out by an article in yesterday’sAsahi print edition (sorry, I couldn’t find this online), imports of frozen beef are actually 28% below 2004 levels!

Clearly the danger here is not for Japanese cattle farmers, but for Japanese consumers who will inevitably have to bear the cost of the tariff and its misuse by their government. The cost of beef has already risen by 20% wholesale and 10% retail since the ban on U.S. imports. Now consumers face another potential price hike because of the tariff.

As for the winners, we have the domestic beef industry, in spite of turning up 15 cases of BSE in recent years, and agriculture interests within the government, which doesn’t make out too badly itself, given the destination of those potential tariff revenues.

Philly Cheesesteaks Suck — My trip to Philadelphia


First, let me tell you why I’m writing this: THE HYPE SURROUNDING PHILLY CHEESE STEAKS IS A LIE AND MUST BE STOPPED. They are disgusting and deserve none of the fame that they have gained. Now let me explain:

I recently had the chance to visit beautiful Philadelphia with Mrs. Adamu. The first capital of the United States includes a major monument to its role in the American Revolution in the center, which was certainly very impressive but not quite impressive enough to actually make me wait in line to see the liberty bell. Mrs. Adamu and I were soon bored, on our way home we decided to try the famous Philly Cheese Steak at Geno’s Steaks in South Philly — the biggest mistake I’ve made in a long time.

I felt betrayed as soon as I took the first bite and was greeted with hot blandness. All the hype, all the anticipation amounted to this:

Listen to the ingredients: Steakums, cheez whiz, and chopped onions on a soggy Portuguese roll. WTF? That’s it? This is the same crap I’ve been heating up in the microwave as a last resort food for years! What gives, Philadelphia??

The only thing that made it edible was the hot sauce that was available in the condiments section. At least then there was something to taste.

Initially I blamed myself. Had Japan tainted my taste buds so that I can no longer enjoy classic American food? Mrs. Adamu, a native Japanese, supported this initial suspicion. But then, no, I reasoned, I still like root beer, cheeseburgers and pancakes, so I must still be American enough to have an objective opinion.

So how could this have happened? Millions of people must be cheated out of their money each year based on the false assumption that something is different about Steakum sandwiches in Philadelphia. What a scam.

Clearly the cheese steaks are popular — there were stands all over the historical district and both Geno’s and the place across the street were lined up. Why weren’t more people spitting out their food and demanding their $6.50 back? I mean that’s a lot to pay for what’s basically the equivalent of peanut butter and jelly.

The answer came to me in a message from God. Without warning someone in a car shouted “NAZI FUCKS!!!!” in our general direction and sped off. Were they talking to me? (I shave my head so who knows) I looked around:

(Read here for more about this guy and Mumia)

(Note the tribute to 9-11 next to the Freedom Fries — aside from us and some other tourists, the rest of the customers were cops and firemen)

It was at once obvious that this place that serves its dubious delicacies with a heaping help of local pride and admiration for the most prominent local heroes, cops and firemen. These people don’t come here for good food, they come here because it’s part of their identity.

Now, that’s all well and good, but why must cheesesteaks then become something pawned off on unsuspecting out-of-towners? Perhaps because without cheesesteaks and the liberty bell, there isn’t exactly much to differentiate Philly from, say, Boston, DC, or other second-tier American cities. Yet I can’t accept the idea that any claim to fame is better than none. You might as well brag about having the world’s best green beans. These things are BLAND, BORING, AND SHAMEFUL. All Philadelphians with any self-respect would do well to shut these scheisters down before they can do any more harm. Besides, I hear they’re run by Nazis.

Japanese Semantics as seen in Media coverage

Japan is infamous for the careful attention it pays to its national image. As a result, some interesting semantic situations can arise. For example, the Japanese media will often try and introduce a Japanese word into the English language in order to put a Japanese spin on a certain issue. Case in point: in February the Kenyan Deputy Minister of Environment’s official visit to Japan held a surprise for PM Koizumi (found via FG):

Last Friday, I met with Professor Wangari Maathai, Kenya’s Deputy Minister of Environment…Prof. Maathai told me how during her visit to Japan she had learned the word “mottainai,” which could be literally translated as “don’t waste what is valuable.” I completely agree with Prof. Maathai on the importance of this concept of “mottainai.” I had thought that it was a concept that foreigners would not fully be able to grasp, but as I listened to Prof. Maathai I realized that I too should do my best to spread this “mottainai” spirit around the world.

However, one poster to the FG forum had something interesting to say about the incident:

This “mottainai” caper has me baffled.
I was at the interview with Maathai hours after she first arrived here. Earlier in the day, I had been asked about “mottainai.” When it came up in the interview, the interpreter used the word “wasteful” (correctly), even though the interviewer had strongly pressed Maathai to use “mottainai.” When Maathai replied, she used “wasteful.” She was then whisked away to another room and I returned to my office to write the story. I received a message that I had to use the word “mottainai” in the lead, even though what she’d had to say about waste was among the least interesting parts of the interview.
I notice every environment story Kyodo is putting out on the environment features the word “mottainai.”
Apparently, the Environment Agency is putting pressure to have the word become widely used in English. It’s not a particularly effective replacement for “waste,” which I think does a fine job in English. My personal opinion is the Environment Agency should worry more about protecting the environment than try to force a new word into the language, which will probably include more pressure on ODA recipients.

It seems the government was putting words in the Deputy Minister’s mouth! I read this and thought little of it until I read an interview with famous Japanese architect Shigeru Ban and HE USED IT TOO!

For his part, Ban says: “I always thought architecture had to be respected. We have the power and the skill.”

Ban worries about waste.

“Mottainai,” he said suddenly, grabbing a reporter’s notebook to write the word. The Japanese expression means something is too good to waste. It is as close as he would come in an hour of conversation to explaining what motivates his work.

He was giving the reporter a tour of the 45,000-square-foot Nomadic Museum on a frigid day last month. Jet-lagged after a flight from Tokyo, he nevertheless was eager to explain his Nomadic design.

Despite being less than talkative at the interview he at least knew the right buzzword to say.

Now let’s look at this Al-Jazeera report which expresses sour grapes over the positive portrayal slain mercenary Akihiko Saito got from the Japanese media:

Japanese media glorifies Iraq hostage

The abduction of Akihiko Saito in Iraq after an ambush on 5 May has sparked an entirely different reaction to the one that greeted the three Japanese who were taken hostage there one year ago.

While Saito, an armed private security officer, has been treated with respect and admiration at home, the two humanitarian workers and a photojournalist were subjected to a sustained attack on their actions, motives and personal lives.

When Noriaki Imai, Nahoko Takato and Soichiro Koriyama returned to Japan this time last year after their hostage ordeal, there were no celebrations and certainly no hero’s welcome.

They were criticised for their stupidity for being in Iraq, the wasting of government money on efforts to secure their release, and dirt was dug up on their families and backgrounds.

True enough. But what’s interesting is their analysis of the language gap in covering the story:

There has been much talk of the large salaries paid for this kind of work as well as the high level of skill and experience required.

The Japanese media has been happy to use the term “youhei”, which translates as “mercenary” or “hired soldier’, to describe Saito, although the image conveyed has been of an exciting and glamorous world.

Interestingly, in the English-language Japanese media, the word “mercenary”, with its negative connotations, has been avoided.

There is a belief in some quarters that the presence of Saito in Iraq helps to legitimise the activities of the Self-Defence Force (SDF), whose members are engaged mainly in guard duties in the most active deployment of Japanese troops since the pacifist constitution was imposed by the US after WWII.

Doshisha University’s professor Watanabe says the Japanese government has been keen to show Saito in a positive light as if he has been working for the security of Japan itself.

Not exactly an easy message to swallow coming from al-Jazeera (I’m sure they’d support mercenaries for the other side), but I’m always fascinated with the subtleties of characterizations like this.

Militant Chikan Subverting Egyptian Democracy, say activists


The BBC reports on a much more targeted and political use of chikan than I had previously though possible:

Egypt anger over ‘grope attacks’

Protesters want senior government figures to admit responsibility

Hundreds of Egyptians have staged an angry protest against the alleged sexual harassment of female activists and reporters by government supporters.

A number of women say they were assaulted by loyalists from the party of President Hosni Mubarak during voting on a referendum last week.

Dressed in black and wearing white ribbons, the women called for senior officials to resign in shame.

Egypt’s government has blamed the assaults on “emotional tension”.

But the crowds outside Egypt’s Press Syndicate building were resolute, calling for the resignation of senior government officials, including interior minister Habib al-Adli.

“Violating the dignity of women is like violating that of our country,” one banner read.

If only the Japanese people would react so swiftly to combat sexual assault!
Continue reading Militant Chikan Subverting Egyptian Democracy, say activists

Coffee-flavored Ramen Available in Tokyo’s Katsushika-ku

This message is intended for Curzon and Nichi Nichi:

I saw this on the Japanese news today:

That’s right. Coffee flavored ramen. It’s a 5-minute walk from Ohanachaya station on the Keisei line. And it’s apparently pretty good. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to eat this strange ramen and let me know how it tastes. Good luck and godspeed!

News Marathon 10: Divided on a female emperor: 4 from Imperial Standards Council Share their views

A good blog post on Japan’s imperial system can be found here (Thanks Metroblogging Tokyo). Anyway, here’s the story:

Asahi.com via Goo News:

PM Koizumi’s personal advisory panel, “The Council of Advisers on Imperial Family Standards” gave their 6th meeting on May 31, asking the opinions of 4 experts in a public conference. Their stances were divided along the lines of maintaining the current male imperial line system, allowing a female emperor, and allowing a female emperor only if taken from the mother’s side.

The panel consisted of: Professor Yasuo Ohara of Kokugakuin (Religion and politics), Asst. Professor Shuji Yagi of Takazaki School of Economics (Constitutional Law), Koji Takahashi of Shizuoka University of Welfare (Imperial Family Studies), and Koichi Yokota of Ryutsu Keizai University (Constitutional Law)

Both Ohara and Yagi supported the patrilineal system. Ohara explained, “The fact that we have followed a male imperial line consistently is the root of our national integration’s power,” and Yagi went on to say, “It is not for modern people to change a male line that has continued unabated for 125 generations.” Both suggested either restoring the old prince system or adoption.

Going further, Professor Ohara explained, “Going with a female line would call the legitimacy of the imperial family into question, with some seeing it as a ‘chance to abolish the imperial system.'” He stressed that changing tradition to allow a female emperor might lead to the end of Japan’s imperial system.

Yagi gave historical examples of emperors such as Emperors Keitai and Koukaku that ascended to the throne despite being “virtually unrelated” to the imperial line.

Meanwhile, Professor Takahashi expressed his opinion that Japan should allow a female emperor. When asked why, he responded, “The basic question of who is most suitable to ascend to the throne is whether he (or she) will be widely supported.” As for the order of succession, Takahashi believes that the first-born is best since it is easy to determine.

Professor Yokota also approved of a female emperor. He added, “Unreasonable suggestions such as an adoption system or restoration of the nobility, or changing tradition in order to allow a female emperor will raise the question of whether there is a need to adhere to the imperial system.”

The advisory panel plans to enter into detailed discussion on the matter on June 8th after asking the opinions of 4 other experts.

News Marathon 9: Press Release: East Japan Bank to Begin Selling Japan Investment Trust Management Co.-managed “Japan Good Dividend Rebalance Open”

This is to inform that East Japan Bank will begin selling Japan Investment Trust Management Co.-managed “Japan Good Dividend Rebalance Open”.

The money management fund “Japan Good Dividend Rebalance Open” is a fund operating with the objective of bringing equal-weighted investments by ranking the Nikkei 500 stocks used in the average in order of highest predicted dividend earnings yield, and using the top 70 brands as investment targets.


(1) Using stocks on the market in Japan’s securities markets, the fund operates with the proactive goal of developing trust funds.
(2) In operation, the fund ranks the Nikkei 500 stocks used in the average in order of highest predicted dividend earnings yield and uses the top 70 brands as investment targets.
(3) In investments, we operate fund allocation to each brand with the goal of always bringing equal-weighted investments. However, depending on the scale of trust funds, stock price changes of capitalized brands, and wether the trust funds have entered redemption reserves the fund may not be equal-weighted investments. For the best ISA for kids, check out this website at thechildrensisa.com to learn more about it.
(4) The fund will undertake review of the capitalized brands and adjustment of the capitalization ratio (rebalance) once a month.
(5) The fund will undertake a closing of accounts 4 times a year (the 7th of Jan., Apr., July, and Oct. (when that day is a holiday it will be done on the next business day) and shall as a rule pay dividends at those times. The dividend amount of the January account settlement shall be decided based on the baseline price standard if the baseline price is above the initial principal.

END.