“They’re going to have to pry my monkey from my cold, dead hand.”

But owning a monkey isn’t inherently political.

Link.

I think what he’s trying to say is that the second ammendment protects my right to bear deadly robotic monkey arms.

One thought on ““They’re going to have to pry my monkey from my cold, dead hand.””

  1. “…capuchins like Daisy are popular pets because they’re lively, small (about 10 pounds), and probably because one made appearances on the sitcom Friends as the pet Marcel. Nonetheless, armed with opposable thumbs and prehensile tails, they have an almost unlimited capacity for causing havoc.”

    The solution to the capuchin problem is simple: ban stupid shows like Friends that feature monkeys. There now. Problem solved! Oh, and just in case, pass another law that mandates owners of monkeys to remove their opposable thumbs and prehensile tails. You know, kind of like having your cat or dog “fixed.”

    Opponents of such measures however, seem to be one step ahead. Hence, the robotic chimp arm with SOT ™. [That’s “Super Opposable Thumb” for those of you not in the know. ]

    Of course, all of this will be meaningless once the Japanese revise Article 9 and figure out how to outfit their native simian species with the latest in robot technology.

    Result: 特攻猿隊.
    Slogan: “This time, we’re after more than just the tops of your daikon.”
    Motto: 見ざる言わざる聞かざる殺せ！

    Sorry, I get a little carried away when it comes to monkeys.

    Hail to the Chimp!

Comments are closed.