<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Temp workers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mutantfrog.com/2008/07/04/temp-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2008/07/04/temp-workers/</link>
	<description>Photos, Stories and articles on East Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:53:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the scarlet symptom</title>
		<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2008/07/04/temp-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-280193</link>
		<dc:creator>the scarlet symptom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutantfrog.com/?p=2228#comment-280193</guid>
		<description>I knew one pour soul working as a prefectural employee on a 364 (yes, three hundred and sixty-FOUR) days-a-year contract to prevent that &quot;automatic lifetime employment&quot; taking effect.  The person in question was treated as a regular employee in terms of job duties and responsibilities (except for that one glorious extra day of unpaid vacation that made all the contractual difference), but not in terms of remuneration or job security.  The eternal temp, what a raw deal- it pained me to witness such precarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew one pour soul working as a prefectural employee on a 364 (yes, three hundred and sixty-FOUR) days-a-year contract to prevent that &#8220;automatic lifetime employment&#8221; taking effect.  The person in question was treated as a regular employee in terms of job duties and responsibilities (except for that one glorious extra day of unpaid vacation that made all the contractual difference), but not in terms of remuneration or job security.  The eternal temp, what a raw deal- it pained me to witness such precarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aceface</title>
		<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2008/07/04/temp-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-280045</link>
		<dc:creator>Aceface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutantfrog.com/?p=2228#comment-280045</guid>
		<description>http://blog.goo.ne.jp/ikedanobuo/e/45a570dd0750a52fe80c0c775ac5c0a5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.goo.ne.jp/ikedanobuo/e/45a570dd0750a52fe80c0c775ac5c0a5" rel="nofollow">http://blog.goo.ne.jp/ikedanobuo/e/45a570dd0750a52fe80c0c775ac5c0a5</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2008/07/04/temp-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-279999</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutantfrog.com/?p=2228#comment-279999</guid>
		<description>To expand a bit on Roy&#039;s post, since I think the fundamental problem is not particularly clear here:

The basic reason this system exists is because &quot;regular employees&quot; are entitled to lifetime employment. They can&#039;t be fired unless they have repeatedly broken their rules of employment, and they can&#039;t be laid off until their employer has essentially gone bankrupt. Regular employees do get laid off from time to time, but it&#039;s generally as part of a consensual deal--i.e., they get a big severance package to voluntarily resign.

The reason they never let contract workers stay for more than three years is that once their contract is renewed three times, they are legally entitled to lifetime employment. (It&#039;s a fuzzier rule than that, but three times is the general understanding.) So the point of the system is to allow (ostensibly less-skilled) employees to be naturally laid off (by not renewing their contracts) without having to pay out severance packages.

Lifetime employment is not a very employer-friendly concept, but among many Japanese people it seems to have the force of religion: they see it as the fundamental difference between business in Japan and business everywhere else. Here, a business is said to be more like a family, where a member can&#039;t be cast away except under really extenuating circumstances. It really is a strong contrast to, say, the United States, where employees are basically disposable (and are often the first expense cut when the economy goes sour).

So assuming lifetime employment remains intact and use of contracted employees declines, how are employers going to meet their labor needs? I reckon it would have the effect of downsizing firms over time: they will want to outsource more of their functions to third-party contractors, so that they have the freedom to alter or entirely cancel the scope and expense of work they need done.

One firm which already seems to be doing this is GABA, the big eikaiwa chain -- it brings in teachers as &quot;independent contractors&quot; and essentially acts as a broker between the teacher pool and the student pool. This way, GABA isn&#039;t saddled with unnecessary personnel expenses if demand starts to fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To expand a bit on Roy&#8217;s post, since I think the fundamental problem is not particularly clear here:</p>
<p>The basic reason this system exists is because &#8220;regular employees&#8221; are entitled to lifetime employment. They can&#8217;t be fired unless they have repeatedly broken their rules of employment, and they can&#8217;t be laid off until their employer has essentially gone bankrupt. Regular employees do get laid off from time to time, but it&#8217;s generally as part of a consensual deal&#8212;i.e., they get a big severance package to voluntarily resign.</p>
<p>The reason they never let contract workers stay for more than three years is that once their contract is renewed three times, they are legally entitled to lifetime employment. (It&#8217;s a fuzzier rule than that, but three times is the general understanding.) So the point of the system is to allow (ostensibly less-skilled) employees to be naturally laid off (by not renewing their contracts) without having to pay out severance packages.</p>
<p>Lifetime employment is not a very employer-friendly concept, but among many Japanese people it seems to have the force of religion: they see it as the fundamental difference between business in Japan and business everywhere else. Here, a business is said to be more like a family, where a member can&#8217;t be cast away except under really extenuating circumstances. It really is a strong contrast to, say, the United States, where employees are basically disposable (and are often the first expense cut when the economy goes sour).</p>
<p>So assuming lifetime employment remains intact and use of contracted employees declines, how are employers going to meet their labor needs? I reckon it would have the effect of downsizing firms over time: they will want to outsource more of their functions to third-party contractors, so that they have the freedom to alter or entirely cancel the scope and expense of work they need done.</p>
<p>One firm which already seems to be doing this is <span class="caps">GABA</span>, the big eikaiwa chain&#8212;it brings in teachers as &#8220;independent contractors&#8221; and essentially acts as a broker between the teacher pool and the student pool. This way, <span class="caps">GABA</span> isn&#8217;t saddled with unnecessary personnel expenses if demand starts to fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Japanese government considering reforms to temporary employment laws Japan Economy News &#38; Blog - Business, Economy, Marketing and Economic Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2008/07/04/temp-workers/comment-page-1/#comment-279933</link>
		<dc:creator>Japanese government considering reforms to temporary employment laws Japan Economy News &#38; Blog - Business, Economy, Marketing and Economic Reports</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutantfrog.com/?p=2228#comment-279933</guid>
		<description>[...] on this proposed law in English at their website. However, what originally caught my eye was a post entitled simply &#8220;Temp workers&#8221; by Roy Berman over at the Mutantfrog Travelogue. Roy&#8217;s post gives a clear insight to the plight of Japan&#8217;s temporary, part-time and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this proposed law in English at their website. However, what originally caught my eye was a post entitled simply &#8220;Temp workers&#8221; by Roy Berman over at the Mutantfrog Travelogue. Roy&#8217;s post gives a clear insight to the plight of Japan&#8217;s temporary, part-time and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
