<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why horizontal strokes are thinner than vertical strokes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mutantfrog.com/2007/05/30/why-horizontal-strokes-are-thinner-than-vertical-strokes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2007/05/30/why-horizontal-strokes-are-thinner-than-vertical-strokes/</link>
	<description>Photos, Stories and articles on East Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:54:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jade Oc</title>
		<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2007/05/30/why-horizontal-strokes-are-thinner-than-vertical-strokes/comment-page-1/#comment-219860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade Oc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutantfrog.com/2007/05/30/why-horizontal-strokes-are-thinner-than-vertical-strokes/#comment-219860</guid>
		<description>Definitely interesting. I guess I had just assumed it was a copying of the Roman fonts where horizontal (or almost) strokes are thinner due to the shape of the nib.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely interesting. I guess I had just assumed it was a copying of the Roman fonts where horizontal (or almost) strokes are thinner due to the shape of the nib.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://www.mutantfrog.com/2007/05/30/why-horizontal-strokes-are-thinner-than-vertical-strokes/comment-page-1/#comment-219819</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 23:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mutantfrog.com/2007/05/30/why-horizontal-strokes-are-thinner-than-vertical-strokes/#comment-219819</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  Certainly it does look more elegant that way -- thick brush strokes aren&#039;t that attractive, especially in computer fonts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  Certainly it does look more elegant that way&#8212;thick brush strokes aren&#8217;t that attractive, especially in computer fonts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
